Accumulation [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Jay – India, 2014-12-01 12:11 (4230 d 06:16 ago) – Posting: # 13960
Views: 4,093

Dear all,

As mentioned in the final guidelines, for prolonged release products, the partial AUC is required for those products with no risk of accumulation.

As in draft GL, it was required by default for prolonged release products. So what would be the rational behind not determining pAUC for PR drugs products with accumulation.

Also, to determine accumulation before study one either need to literature search or there would be compulsory requirement of pilot study.

Suppose, the study designed who is designed on the basis of accumulation i.e. without pAUC and the results does show accumulation. :confused::-D Would it be acceptable?

Also regarding the truncation point for pAUC, in 6.1.1.2, "the half of the dosage interval are recommended" so can this be considered thumb rule for truncation of pAUC of PR Products.?

Regards,
Jay

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
316 visitors (0 registered, 316 guests [including 18 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:28 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Try to learn something about everything
and everything about something.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5