Stopping for futility [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2014-11-28 15:21 (3859 d 20:19 ago) – Posting: # 13952
Views: 3,601

Dear all,

❝ If I understand well the idea is only to test for futility. This is unusual in BE trials, but common practice in Phase III trials. The futility test should be described in the protocol submitted to the Ethics Committee.


Correct. Since to my knowledge nothing is published yet, perform simulations before the study in order to demonstrate that the patient’s risk (type I error) is maintained. Hint: The [image]-package Power2Stage.

❝ What I think would not be acceptable to Agencies (at least in Europe)…


Correct again. BE-GL, Subject accountability:

The data from all treated subjects should be treated equally. […] It should be planned that all treated subjects should be included in the analysis […].


Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,672 registered users;
29 visitors (0 registered, 29 guests [including 23 identified bots]).
Forum time: 12:41 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Reach for the stars,
even if you have to stand on a cactus.    Susan Longacre

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5