Difficult formulations [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2014-11-19 21:15 (4232 d 18:04 ago) – Posting: # 13891
Views: 16,053

Hi Angus,

❝ […] it shows the variability at the earlier time intervals in the fed state is huge and that makes the point very well. I am thinking that the food delays gastric emptying so the formulations are retained in the stomach ~ 3 hours prior to transiting to the small intestine.


Exactly. That’s actually the idea behind formulations with differently coated pellets.

❝ {would have thought that Concerta would be OK, since it has an IR overcoat component}.


Concerta shows a smaller food effect, but we see some shift in osmotic pumps as well.

❝ I wonder how the within subject variability in the fasted state compares with the fed state for such formulations at the corresponding time intervals.


That’s a difficult question. There are formulations with different release mecha­nisms on the market. All show a food effect (practically only on rate metrics), some don’t work in fasted state very well (dose dumping), most fail in vitro alcohol-induced dose dumping, variability of the early phase in fed state might be higher (most formulations) or lower (some drugs)… :blahblah:

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
124 visitors (0 registered, 124 guests [including 15 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:19 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists cannot simply hang their subjectivities
up on a hook outside the laboratory door.    Ruth Bleier

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5