Acceptance limit for the upper 95% con­fi­dence bound? [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2014-11-17 13:49 (4240 d 22:28 ago) – Posting: # 13871
Views: 16,457

Hi John,

❝ Laszlo E is not amused :-)


Yes. He also pointed to the last paragraph on page 6. On has to calculate the upper 95% con­fi­dence bound for σ²D – but the guidance doesn’t give an acceptance limit for it. Like in the 2001 stats guidance we only find “the recommended allowance for σ²D is 0.03”. Why struggle with its CL if only the estimate has to be assessed?

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,572 registered users;
341 visitors (0 registered, 341 guests [including 15 identified bots]).
Forum time: 13:18 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The real struggle is not between the right and the left
but between the party of the thoughtful
and the party of the jerks.    Jimmy Wales

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5