Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • What???

What??? [Software]

posted by Helmut – Vienna, Austria, 2014-10-06 19:08 (3866 d 02:04 ago) – Posting: # 13655
Views: 39,193

Ahoy, my Capt’n!

❝ What??? [image] You cannot be serious.

Great!

❝ On board my proud vessel we just hit the auto-IQ/OQ/PQ scripts and we never had any problems.

Actually this was one of my favorite diving sites once I let go the anchor of my vessel. Nice slope followed by a drop-off. Now a grid of steel and a bunch of concrete blocks…

BTW, I found another reference dataset (Supplemental examples to the veterinary BE guidance VICH GL52). Interesting that the guidance does not suggest rounding of the CI). Quote from the supp.:

All correctly programmed analyzed data should give the following results (Tables 2 and 3). […]

Using the statistical output information, we calculated the confidence bounds:

Lower BE Bound = Exp(-0.0346) = 0.97
Upper BE Bound = Exp(0.0738) = 1.08

If both the lower and upper BE bounds are between 0.80 and 1.25, bioequivalence is established for that value.

I got for p (Sequence) 0.9529 (not 0.9527) and the CI as 0.9660–1.0766.

—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
Helmut Schütz

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

reference dataset elba.romero 2013-07-02 05:08 [Software]
- Public datasets Helmut 2013-07-02 15:44
  - Public datasets yjlee168 2013-07-03 03:10
    - Public datasets elba.romero 2013-07-03 05:19
      - Public datasets yjlee168 2013-07-03 13:11
        
        Challenging data sets Helmut 2013-07-03 16:32
        
        Fantastic idea? ⇒ Challenging data sets yjlee168 2013-07-04 08:06
        
        Fantastic idea! Helmut 2013-07-04 13:18
    - NIST; cross-validation Helmut 2013-07-03 14:28
      - NIST; cross-validation yjlee168 2013-07-03 23:47
        
        NIST; cross-validation Helmut 2013-07-04 00:45
  - Public datasets elba.romero 2013-07-03 05:10
- Eight Reference Datasets (2×2×2 ☑) Helmut 2014-10-06 02:24
  - What??? ElMaestro 2014-10-06 13:20
    - What???Helmut 2014-10-06 17:08
      - What??? ElMaestro 2014-10-06 17:31
        
        What the heck‽ Helmut 2014-10-06 19:05
  - link of electronic supplement material? yjlee168 2014-10-07 09:53
    - link of electronic supplement material? nobody 2014-10-07 10:59
      - Thanks! yjlee168 2014-10-07 11:35
        
        Thanks! nobody 2014-10-07 11:44
        
        Direct links & hint Helmut 2014-10-07 13:54
    - Replicated designs are relevant, too ElMaestro 2014-10-07 12:36
      - Replicated designs are relevant, too yjlee168 2014-10-07 13:00
        
        RSABE: SAS and PHX/WNL only? Helmut 2014-10-07 14:47
        
        for the future? yjlee168 2014-10-08 10:05
        
        Star Trek: The Next Generation Helmut 2014-10-09 00:26
        
        Star Trek: The Next Generation d_labes 2014-10-09 08:09
        Star Trek: The Next Generation nobody 2014-10-09 08:23
        Star Trek: The Next Generation yjlee168 2014-10-09 11:06
        
        Some comments ElMaestro 2014-10-09 11:52
        
        Some comments yjlee168 2014-10-09 12:18
        
        Proc MIXED - start value d_labes 2014-10-10 08:35
        
        Proc MIXED - start value ElMaestro 2014-10-10 11:44
        Proc MIXED - start value yjlee168 2014-10-11 21:09
        
        Proc MIXED - start value ElMaestro 2014-10-11 21:18
        
        Optimizer settings Helmut 2014-10-09 14:08
        
        Optimizer settings nobody 2014-10-09 15:32
        Optimizer settings yjlee168 2014-10-09 18:14
        
        FDA’s model… Helmut 2014-10-09 18:34
  - Just received a letter… Helmut 2014-11-03 14:54
  - 11 Reference Datasets (2-group parallel ☑) Helmut 2014-12-09 15:51