Group effects EMA [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by ElMaestro  – Belgium?, 2014-10-01 11:31 (2133 d 17:00 ago) – Posting: # 13630
Views: 32,559

Hi Mittyri,

» More effects in model mean wider intervals.
» Please correct me if I'm wrong.

That's kind of incorrect.
The more effects you have in your model, the more variation is accounted for by the totality of terms; the residual will decrease as will be residual's degrees of freedom. Therefore the width of the CI tends to shrink.

It may happen that the inclusion of a term apparently does nothing. This is due to the design where some effect may contain the other; in such situation the residual variance, the residual df and the width of the CI remain unaffected. But you will never see the CI widened due to more factors.

I could be wrong, but...

Best regards,
ElMaestro

"Pass or fail" (D. Potvin et al., 2008)

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
20,964 posts in 4,373 threads, 1,459 registered users;
online 13 (0 registered, 13 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: Tuesday 04:31 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

My doctor gave me six months to live,
but when I couldn’t pay the bill
he gave me six months more.    Walter Matthau

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5