Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • 156 ?

156 ? [Study Assessment]

posted by unique_one – India, 2014-07-08 16:03 (3578 d 17:47 ago) – Posting: # 13241
Views: 11,884

Dear d_labes,

Thanks for sharing information!

Regards,
unique_one

Complete thread:

Results Analysis unique_one 2014-07-08 08:58 [Study Assessment]
- Results Analysis ElMaestro 2014-07-08 10:08
  - Results Analysis unique_one 2014-07-08 10:42
    - Don’t hurry; explore consequences Helmut 2014-07-08 12:00
      - Don’t hurry; explore consequences unique_one 2014-07-08 14:01
        
        The smaller a study, the more uncertain its results Helmut 2014-07-08 17:39
        
        The smaller a study, the more uncertain its results unique_one 2014-07-09 06:59
        
        The smaller a study, the more uncertain its results unique_one 2014-07-10 07:09
    - 156 ? d_labes 2014-07-08 12:03
      - 156 ?unique_one 2014-07-08 14:03
    - Results Analysis Shuanghe 2014-07-08 12:57
      - Results Analysis unique_one 2014-07-08 14:08
        
        Results Analysis Samaya B 2014-07-09 07:58
        
        bootstrap Shuanghe 2014-07-09 18:26
        
        bootstrap Weidson 2021-07-03 01:36
        
        Bootstrapping BE: An attempt in 🇷 Helmut 2021-07-08 13:50
        
        Bootstrapping BE: An attempt in 🇷 ElMaestro 2021-07-09 14:15
        
        Bootstrapping BE: Desultory thoughts Helmut 2021-07-09 14:50
        
        Bootstrapping BE: Desultory thoughts ElMaestro 2021-07-09 16:29
        
        Bootstrapping BE: Desultory thoughts Helmut 2021-07-09 21:04
- Results Analysis Achievwin 2021-08-17 19:26

Admin contact
22,993 posts in 4,828 threads, 1,656 registered users;
108 visitors (0 registered, 108 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: 09:51 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Never never never never use Excel.
Not even for calculation of arithmetic means. Martin Wolfsegger

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz