Results Analysis [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by unique_one – India, 2014-07-08 10:58 (3573 d 04:17 ago) – Posting: # 13234
Views: 13,546

Dear All,

Results obtained from 2 way-crossover study of 28 volunteers are as mentioned below:

90% CI AUC: Lower limit - 98.35, Upper limit - 132.50
90% CI Cmax: Lower limit - 95.38, Upper limit - 127.80

T/R ratio of AUC: 112.2
T/R ratio of Cmax: 109.5

Intrasubject CV% AUC: 27.3
Intrasubject CV% Cmax: 28.2

Questions:
  1. Primary reason for BE Failure?
  2. Do re-formulation would be needed?
Regards,
unique_one.


Edit: Category changed. [Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,987 posts in 4,824 threads, 1,664 registered users;
91 visitors (0 registered, 91 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:15 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The only way to comprehend what mathematicians mean by Infinity
is to contemplate the extent of human stupidity.    Voltaire

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5