Group effect commonly not relevant [Software]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2014-07-07 01:57 (3941 d 20:29 ago) – Posting: # 13224
Views: 26,738

Hi Angus,

❝ I did see that Formulation not Treatment later after lunch,


For years I try to convince Pharsight to switch from “Formulation” to the more general “Treatment”.

❝ Then following your direction about Group being a classification variable…


Yep, in the BE-module standard mappings are Subject, Sequence, Period, and Formulation. Any additional Classification variables (aka factors = categorical in­de­pen­dent variables) have to be manually mapped. The same is true for regressors (aka con­ti­nu­ous covariates like body weight).

❝ … (and including subject in model) I did get it to work.


Hhm, I think that Subject should have been mapped automatically. :confused:

❝ Many thanks and also your sample size program in R works well: I have almost zero experience in R, but the reference you provided was easy to follow.


The flowers should go to Detlew. I wrote maybe <1‰ of the code…

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,670 registered users;
25 visitors (0 registered, 25 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 22:27 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The combination of some data and an aching desire
for an answer does not ensure that a reasonable answer
can be extracted from a given body of data.    John W. Tukey

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5