Group effect commonly not relevant [Software]

posted by AngusMcLean – USA, 2014-07-07 00:52 (4359 d 02:42 ago) – Posting: # 13222
Views: 30,588

Hello Helmut: Yes; I did see that Formulation not Treatment later after lunch, but it still did not work. Then following your direction about Group being a classification variable (and including subject in model) I did get it to work.

Dependent hyothesis     NumDF Denomin     Fstat       p value
Ln(AUC)   int               1   64    11226.673       0
Ln(AUC)   Group             1   64        0.006028186 0.93835554
Ln(AUC)   Sequence          1   64        3.4513852   0.067800018
Ln(AUC)   Group*Sequence    1   64        0.000321727 0.9857451
Ln(AUC)   Group*Period      2   64        0.064946799 0.937179
Ln(AUC)   Formulation       1   64        0.36503556  0.54785867
Ln(AUC)   Formulation*Group 1   64        0.002630007 0.95925927

The formulation by group interaction p value was 0.95 for this composed data set.

Many thanks and also your sample size program in R works well: I have almost zero experience in R, but the reference you provided was easy to follow.


Here is the setup I used in Phoenix: Subject has to be mapped to get it to work (see link below)
http://screencast.com/t/EpJVIvdBr

Angus


Edit: BBCoded and a later post merged. [Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,571 registered users;
124 visitors (0 registered, 124 guests [including 49 identified bots]).
Forum time: 03:34 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

To propose that poor design can be corrected by subtle analysis techniques
is contrary to good scientific thinking.    Stuart J. Pocock

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5