To pool or not to pool [Software]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2014-07-01 00:22 (4371 d 01:04 ago) – Posting: # 13182
Views: 31,140

Hi Zan,

❝ Was it due to significant effect observed for Group x Treatment that resulted in the reviewer's decision to run final analysis by separate groups (on Page 5)?


Sure. The text contains a reference:

In control #98-392 (see attachment), it is stated that “if the Group-by-Treat­ment interaction is statistically significant (p<0.1), DBE requested that equi­va­lence be demonstrated in one of the groups, provided that the group meets mini­mum requirements for a complete bioequivalence study”.

However, #98-392 is not attached. I failed to dig it out at the FDA (controlled corres­pon­dence not covered by FOI?). Note the wording almost identical to my post above.

Please no more TOFU in future posts. THX.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,570 registered users;
121 visitors (0 registered, 121 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:27 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

“Data! Data! Data!” he cried impatiently.
“I can’t make bricks without clay!”    Arthur Conan Doyle

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5