To pool or not to pool [Software]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2014-06-30 23:38 (3954 d 05:33 ago) – Posting: # 13179
Views: 27,536

Hi Zan,

THX for the reference! With one week between groups I would never ever thought a milli­second of setting up a group model. Obviously this was also the approach of the applicant. In Table 9 (page 19) we read:

┌──────────────────────────┬──────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Do you agree or disagree │ Do not agree. Firm analyzed the data │
│ with firm’s decision?    │ as one group, the reviewer analyzed  │
│                          │ data as two separate groups.         │
└──────────────────────────┴──────────────────────────────────────┘


Without knowing the original data I will not comment on the reviewers comments. Do you think that she is aware of “false positives”?

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,670 registered users;
83 visitors (0 registered, 83 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:11 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

There are two possible outcomes: if the result confirms the
hypothesis, then you’ve made a measurement. If the result is
contrary to the hypothesis, then you’ve made a discovery.    Enrico Fermi

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5