Two groups (e.g. logistics) [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2007-11-16 16:07 (5998 d 06:59 ago) – Posting: # 1303
Views: 11,703

Dear Sangeea,

since I recently had to deal with deficiency letters from the Gulf States (Saudia Arabia, Emirates), I would suggest the following procedure:

Fixed:  Sequence + Treatment + Period + Group + Treatment × Group
Random: Subject(Sequence)

Tests for Group and Treatment × Group.

If the ‘Treatment × Group Interaction’ term is statistically not significant (p>0.05), the simple model (i.e., naïve pooling of data without both Group-terms) can be applied.*



Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,986 posts in 4,823 threads, 1,671 registered users;
81 visitors (0 registered, 81 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:07 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Art is “I”; science is “we”.    Claude Bernard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5