TSD: 2 cross-overs [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2014-05-16 14:03 (4009 d 10:06 ago) – Posting: # 12956
Views: 6,120

Hi Tina,

❝ Is it possible to have a two-stage design in a 4-way crossover study (involving fasting and fed of both R and T) if variability observed between the two conditions differ pointing to 2 different sample sizes for fasting and fed.

  1. In a completely randomized study (beman’s Approach 1 above) you’ll get one (pooled) estimated variance. Nothing is published yet. You have to perform simulations in oder to demonstrate that the patient’s risk is maintained. Good luck.
  2. In beman’s Approach 2 you’ll get separate estimates of variances in fasting and fed conditions. Therefore, second stages can be of different sizes.

❝ Suppose fasting reuires 60 subjects and fed requires 100 subjects, do we have to dose 100 subjects intoto or to separate the sample sizes?


Example for #2: First stage 48 subjects, CVfasting 34%, CVfed 45%, Method B (T/R 0.95, 80% power). Perform the second stage in 60–48=12 subjects fasting and 100–48=52 subjects fed.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,671 registered users;
168 visitors (0 registered, 168 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:10 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

[Those] who have an excessive faith in their theories or in their
ideas are not only poorly disposed to make discoveries, but they
also make very poor observations.    Claude Bernard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5