Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • Post hoc power #666

Post hoc power #666 [General Statistics]

posted by Helmut – Vienna, Austria, 2014-03-14 14:31 (4490 d 00:18 ago) – Posting: # 12623
Views: 11,016

Hi Kumar,

❝ As we understand, in Nordic countries, […]

Only in Denmark.

As stated by ElMaestro – submit the study. I would suggest to remove “power” from the report for two reasons:

Educational. Post hoc power is meaningless. Don’t submit nonsense.
Your numbers are likely wrong. How did you derive them?
Assuming a fully replicated design I got:
- C_max (reference-scaled) 95.33%, unscaled 87.95%
- AUC_0–t unscaled 99.94%
If the design was a partial replicate, “power” would be lower.

—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
Helmut Schütz

[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Treat significance shri 2008-09-05 07:42 [General Statistics]
- Treat significance ElMaestro 2008-09-05 08:50
  - Denmark Ohlbe 2008-09-05 10:27
    - Denmark ElMaestro 2008-09-05 12:02
      - Denmark Ohlbe 2008-09-05 12:31
        
        Denmark ElMaestro 2008-09-05 13:03
    - Denmark shri 2008-09-06 10:25
      - Statistically different or clinically different Ohlbe 2008-09-06 16:43
        
        Statistically different or clinically different shri 2008-09-08 06:29
        
        Statistically different or clinically different kumarnaidu 2014-03-14 06:54
        
        Statistically different or clinically different ElMaestro 2014-03-14 07:10
        
        Statistically different or clinically different kumarnaidu 2014-03-14 12:36
        
        Post hoc power #666Helmut 2014-03-14 13:31
        Post hoc power - power of which test? d_labes 2014-03-14 13:53
        
        Post hoc power - power of which test? kumarnaidu 2014-03-15 10:56

Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
253 visitors (0 registered, 253 guests [including 25 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:50 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas. Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz