Non-informative “profiles” [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by fno Homepage – Belgium, 2014-03-11 16:52 (4064 d 14:15 ago) – Posting: # 12599
Views: 10,187

Dear Helmut, dear Ohlbe,

Thank you so much already for your feed-back!

❝ Fabrice stated that this was not a BE study. I think we need more information.


The context is the following:The study is thus not at risk :cool: from a PK point of view.
But I was nevertheless interested on what would be the suggestions to best handle such a situation from a pure statistical point of view.
For PK, the potential impact is on the steady-state vs single dose comparison, but you can also simply consider the computation of the descriptive geometric mean Cmax and AUC... how to best deal with a zero value?

As I already mentioned, it is not the first time I encounter this kind of issue.
I am therefore thinking to describe the handling of such cases in our SOPs, which we can refer to when nothing is specifically planned in the protocol or in the SAP :clap:.

Many thanks!

Kind regards,
Fabrice

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,667 registered users;
25 visitors (0 registered, 25 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 08:08 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It is true that many scientists are not philosophically minded
and have hitherto shown much skill and ingenuity
but little wisdom.    Max Born

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5