SOPitis [Design Issues]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2014-02-26 23:31 (4090 d 17:16 ago) – Posting: # 12522
Views: 5,743

Hi Mittyri,

❝ Could you give an example of wording?

❝ "Multicentre, single-dose, randomised, open label, two-sequence, two-period, crossover, bioavailability study in male and female patients under fed conditions with gender stratification" - something like that?


Yes, or simply "Multicentre, single-dose, gender-stratified, randomised, open label, two-sequence, two-period, crossover, bioavailability study under fed conditions."

❝ Would stratification be applicable in BEQ studies from assessors point of view? Any experience?


I think so but I am hard pressed to think of a common situation where it would be really relevant.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,669 registered users;
63 visitors (0 registered, 63 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:47 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

We should not speak so that it is possible
for the audience to understand us,
but so that it is impossible
for them to misunderstand us.    Quintilian

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5