lm() or lme() for 2x2x2 study design? [Software]

posted by yjlee168 Homepage – Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 2014-02-04 14:09 (4155 d 20:08 ago) – Posting: # 12335
Views: 28,122

(edited on 2014-02-04 17:06)

Dear ElMaestro and all,

Thanks for your messages and good to hear that. The reason I asked was that it would be related to how I would modify bear later. BTW, results obtained from R's lme() may differ from that from SAS's PROC MIXED. As I ran lme() with the dataset that I provided before, I got different MSE (0.0244=0.15620852), CVintra(15.7%) and V(subj(seq)) (1.11*10-06)2 for AUC0-tfrom that using SAS's PROC MIXED as posted by Detlew. I still check with my codes to see if I do anything wrong.

❝ [...]

❝ So lm and not lme for 2,2,2-BE.


All the best,
-- Yung-jin Lee
bear v2.9.2:- created by Hsin-ya Lee & Yung-jin Lee
Kaohsiung, Taiwan https://www.pkpd168.com/bear
Download link (updated) -> here

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,673 registered users;
46 visitors (0 registered, 46 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:17 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5