lm() or lme() for 2x2x2 study design? [Software]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2014-02-03 23:11 (4095 d 23:06 ago) – Posting: # 12329
Views: 27,540

Hi Yung-jin,


EU: All fixed, no discussion.
US: All fixed, but lots of confusion because the SAS PROC GLM has the random statement, giving users the impression that subject is treated as a random effect in the model.
Other places: Same, as far as I know. Some places might accept lme, but would probably at the outset nevertheless expect a simple linear model.

So lm and not lme for 2,2,2-BE.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,670 registered users;
17 visitors (0 registered, 17 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 23:18 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The true Enlightenment thinker, the true rationalist,
never wants to talk anyone into anything.
No, he does not even want to convince;
all the time he is aware that he may be wrong.    Karl R. Popper

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5