lm() or lme() for 2x2x2 study design? [Software]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2014-02-03 23:11 (4156 d 10:18 ago) – Posting: # 12329
Views: 28,049

Hi Yung-jin,


EU: All fixed, no discussion.
US: All fixed, but lots of confusion because the SAS PROC GLM has the random statement, giving users the impression that subject is treated as a random effect in the model.
Other places: Same, as far as I know. Some places might accept lme, but would probably at the outset nevertheless expect a simple linear model.

So lm and not lme for 2,2,2-BE.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,672 registered users;
44 visitors (0 registered, 44 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 10:30 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5