All models are wrong… [Software]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2014-02-02 03:31 (4158 d 07:17 ago) – Posting: # 12312
Views: 28,276

Hi ElMaestro,

❝ Actually, I am inclined to think there is something wrong with that subtraction in the first place.


I told you on the phone that I’m going to meet Martin. He said: “Maybe the model is wrong.” Fuck. In Chow/Liu Chapter 7.3.1 (p192 last edition) I read:

A negative estimate may indicate that model 3.1.1 is incorrect or sample size is too small. More details on negative estimates in analysis of variance components can be found in Hocking (1985).

My emphasis. 3.1.1 is the usual 2,2,2 (though with carry over).
So if this model is wrong, which one is correct? :confused:

I’m not sure whether I shall invest in a book I likely will not understand anyway.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,673 registered users;
56 visitors (0 registered, 56 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:49 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5