Just thinking loud [Software]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2014-02-01 20:02 (4098 d 02:59 ago) – Posting: # 12309
Views: 27,815

(edited on 2014-02-02 01:27)

Thanks Yung-jin,

❝ ❝ "MSSubject(seq)-MSResidual" enter the game?


❝ Should be this (as presented values in my previous post), I guess.



Here I am thinking loud, and usually nothing good results when I do it. But here goes:


By way of a typical anova (forget for a moment the case of imbalance and type III SS which is irrelevant anyway for the actual dataset example) we have:

SStot=SStrt+SSseq+SSper+SSsubj+SSres
where
MSsubj=SSsubj/(n-2) [n=total number of subjects counting both sequences]
and

MSres= SSres/(n-2).

I want to know what the color and taste of "MSsubj-MSres" as prescribed above is:
MSsubj=SSsubj/(n-2)
or
MSsubj=(SStot-SStrt-SSseq-SSper-SSres)/(n-2)


Then
"MSsubj-MSres" = (SStot-SStrt-SSseq-SSper-SSres)/(n-2) - SSres/(n-2)
= (SStot-SStrt-SSseq-SSper-2*SSres)/(n-2)
This is truly a mindf%cker. My brain refuses to cooperate. I am experiencing the cerebral equivalent of a
Proton M rocket launch.
Actually, I am inclined to think there is something wrong with that subtraction in the first place.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,670 registered users;
25 visitors (0 registered, 25 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:02 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The true Enlightenment thinker, the true rationalist,
never wants to talk anyone into anything.
No, he does not even want to convince;
all the time he is aware that he may be wrong.    Karl R. Popper

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5