Negative variance component [Software]

posted by yjlee168 Homepage – Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 2014-01-31 11:26 (4506 d 13:47 ago) – Posting: # 12302
Views: 32,841

Dear all,

Sorry to cut in. Yes, non-estimable CVinter could happen, I guess. In bear, we had a dataset for demo run purpose (single-dose, 2x2x2 design; and the dataset can be obtained from the top menu of bear ('Generate/export all demo datatsets'; it's called 'Single2x2x2_demo.csv' or 'Single2x2x2_demo.RData'.) ln(Cmax) is OK, but for ln(AUC0-t) and ln(AUC0-inf), we got

for ln(AUC0-t)...
Intra_subj. CV = 100*sqrt(exp(MSResidual)-1) = 18.392 %
Inter_subj. CV = 100*sqrt(exp((MSSubject(seq)-MSResidual)/2)-1)
               =  NaN %
    MSResidual = 0.0332664
MSSubject(seq) = 0.02123317 ...


and

for ln(AUC0-inf)...
Intra_subj. CV = 100*sqrt(exp(MSResidual)-1) = 17.788 %
Inter_subj. CV = 100*sqrt(exp((MSSubject(seq)-MSResidual)/2)-1)
               =  NaN %
    MSResidual = 0.03114947
MSSubject(seq) = 0.01895625  ...


Happy Chinese Lunar New Year (today)!

❝ ...for PHX:

❝ if(Hypothesis = 'Sequence*Subject', 100*sqrt(exp((MS-MSerror)/2)-1), ''), in my data MS is smaller than MSerror hence the resultant number before taking last step squareroot becomes negative.


All the best,
-- Yung-jin Lee
bear v2.9.6:- created by Hsin-ya Lee & Yung-jin Lee
Kaohsiung, Taiwan https://www.pkpd168.com/bear
Download link (updated) -> here

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,571 registered users;
428 visitors (0 registered, 428 guests [including 65 identified bots]).
Forum time: 02:13 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I’m all in favor of the democratic principle
that one idiot is as good as one genius, but I draw the line
when someone takes the next step and concludes
that two idiots are better than one genius.    Leo Szilard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5