Period effect [Off Topic]

posted by Dr_Dan  – Germany, 2014-01-28 11:36 (4535 d 09:49 ago) – Posting: # 12281
Views: 16,962

Dear kumarnaidu
That's interesting. Why is the bioavailability much better in period 1 than in period 2 for both, test and reference? Systematic error? Artefact? What was the number of subjects and what was the CVintra?
Kind regards
Dan

Kind regards and have a nice day
Dr_Dan

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
284 visitors (0 registered, 284 guests [including 19 identified bots]).
Forum time: 22:26 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5