Fixed effects rather than random effects [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Erkin – 2014-01-21 17:20 (4540 d 03:18 ago) – Posting: # 12218
Views: 6,790

Dear All,

According to EMA BE GL 2010, 4.1.8.Evaluation / Statistical Analysis:
The terms to be used in the ANOVA model are usually sequence, subject within sequence, period and formulation. Fixed effects, rather than random effects, should be used for all terms.

And according to Mr. Helmut Schütz's 23-25 May 2012 Moscow Presentation PK–NCA, PK based Design, Biostatistics Part I Moscow PK-NCA, PK based Design

on page 111 and 112, the default setting of PHNX has to be changed to subject(sequence) to Fixed Effects.

We're using subject (sequence) as Random Effects in our statistical calculations for 2x2 cross-over design. We've done the calculations with two methods of ANOVA, and the results are the same.

The calculations with random effects are acceptable from EMA?

Thank you all...

Erkin Alkan

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
366 visitors (0 registered, 366 guests [including 16 identified bots]).
Forum time: 21:39 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Don’t compromise yourself.
You are all you’ve got.    Janis Joplin

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5