5 %: both formulations [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2014-01-20 18:32 (4545 d 06:40 ago) – Posting: # 12210
Views: 5,378

Dear Helmut,

❝ I would follow the argument in Jean-Michel’s extreme example. Therefore, IMHO the 5% should be based on the API seen from a galenic perspective (e.g., the salt), not the PK perspective (“active moiety”).


I'm not a specialist - but I would agree. This is the most conservative approach, the most protective from the patients' point of view.

Regards
Ohlbe

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
283 visitors (0 registered, 283 guests [including 28 identified bots]).
Forum time: 02:13 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

When you meet the Buddha, you kill him;
when you meet the patriarchs, you kill them.    Wumen Huikai

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5