design [Design Issues]
Hello everyone,
I am little bit confused with the above sequence. I think there might be some imbalance can occur for the above sequence sequence
RT1RT2 for T1 - RT1R
T1RT2R for T1 - T1RR
T2RT1R for T1 - RT1R
RT2RT1 for T1 - RRT1
Here we will get RT1R twice ??. According to me we should go with the three sequence.
Can we keep the below sequence.
T1T2RR for T1- T1RR and for T2-T2RR
RT1T2R for T1- RT1R and for T2-RT2R
RRT1T2 for T1- RRT1 and for T2-RRT2
Let's take the opinion from other members.
❝ But, I would stick to the below mentioned sequence if I were you
❝
❝ RT1RT2
❝ T1RT2R
❝ T2RT1R
❝ RT2RT1
I am little bit confused with the above sequence. I think there might be some imbalance can occur for the above sequence sequence
RT1RT2 for T1 - RT1R
T1RT2R for T1 - T1RR
T2RT1R for T1 - RT1R
RT2RT1 for T1 - RRT1
Here we will get RT1R twice ??. According to me we should go with the three sequence.
Can we keep the below sequence.
T1T2RR for T1- T1RR and for T2-T2RR
RT1T2R for T1- RT1R and for T2-RT2R
RRT1T2 for T1- RRT1 and for T2-RRT2
Let's take the opinion from other members.
—
Kumar Naidu
Kumar Naidu
Complete thread:
- Two Tests with Same Reference Noha Abdeljawad 2012-11-27 08:18 [Design Issues]
- Crossover designs with more than 2 treatments d_labes 2012-11-27 09:51
- Crossover designs with more than 2 treatments Noha Abdeljawad 2012-11-29 07:43
- Sounds wrong to me ElMaestro 2012-11-27 12:10
- Sounds wrong to me Dr_Dan 2012-11-27 14:32
- Sounds wrong to me Noha Abdeljawad 2012-11-29 07:52
- Two Tests with Same Reference jag009 2012-11-28 21:26
- FDA & multiplicity Helmut 2012-11-30 14:04
- FDA & multiplicity jag009 2012-11-30 15:16
- FDA & multiplicity Helmut 2012-11-30 16:12
- FDA & multiplicity jag009 2012-11-30 22:47
- FDA & multiplicity Helmut 2012-12-01 02:00
- FDA & multiplicity jag009 2012-12-03 21:53
- FDA & multiplicity Helmut 2012-12-01 02:00
- FDA & multiplicity jag009 2012-11-30 22:47
- FDA & multiplicity Helmut 2012-11-30 16:12
- Multiplicity: Mixed feelings ElMaestro 2012-11-30 15:24
- Multiplicity: Mixed feelings Helmut 2012-11-30 15:52
- Multiplicity: Mixed feelings martin 2012-12-03 09:24
- Multiplicity: Mixed feelings kumarnaidu 2013-12-12 11:03
- More infos, please Helmut 2013-12-12 15:27
- Multiplicity: Mixed feelings Helmut 2012-11-30 15:52
- FDA & multiplicity jag009 2012-11-30 15:16
- Two Tests with Same Reference Noha Abdeljawad 2012-12-03 08:29
- Two Tests with Same Reference jag009 2012-12-03 15:35
- X-way d_labes 2012-12-04 09:25
- design kvgreddy06 2013-12-19 15:32
- design kvgreddy06 2013-12-30 16:48
- design intuitivepharma 2013-12-31 06:44
- designkumarnaidu 2013-12-31 08:24
- Problematic design Helmut 2013-12-31 15:02
- Problematic design kvgreddy06 2014-01-03 14:46
- Problematic design kumarnaidu 2014-12-24 12:56
- Problematic design Helmut 2014-12-24 16:10
- Problematic design kumarnaidu 2014-12-26 05:38
- Two fully replicated designs? Helmut 2014-12-27 15:52
- Problematic design kumarnaidu 2014-12-26 05:38
- Problematic design Helmut 2014-12-24 16:10
- Problematic design Helmut 2013-12-31 15:02
- designkumarnaidu 2013-12-31 08:24
- design intuitivepharma 2013-12-31 06:44
- design kvgreddy06 2013-12-30 16:48
- design kvgreddy06 2013-12-19 15:32
- X-way d_labes 2012-12-04 09:25
- Two Tests with Same Reference jag009 2012-12-03 15:35
- FDA & multiplicity Helmut 2012-11-30 14:04
- Crossover designs with more than 2 treatments d_labes 2012-11-27 09:51
