estimated AUC72 [NCA / SHAM]

posted by Dr_Dan  – Germany, 2013-10-15 14:24 (4265 d 13:58 ago) – Posting: # 11666
Views: 11,695

Dear Ratnakar

❝ Query 1: What approach we should implement while comparing such a variable AUCt? Is it a correct method to compare AUC8hrs to AUC36 hrs? Or Is there any other statistical method which we should adopt for such situation?


As John already pointed out it is the intra-subject comparison that we are talking about when evaluation bioequivalence. Do you compare fast vs. slow metabolizers (i.e. inter-subject comparison)?

❝ Query 2: Since extrapolation is more than 20% how do we justify such situation?


Could you please explain how do you extrapolate AUC0-inf?
This would help
Best Regards,
Dan

Kind regards and have a nice day
Dr_Dan

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,676 registered users;
48 visitors (0 registered, 48 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 04:23 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Complex, statistically improbable things are by their nature
more difficult to explain than
simple, statistically probable things.    Richard Dawkins

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5