estimated AUC72 [NCA / SHAM]

posted by ratnakar1811 – India, 2013-10-15 08:23 (4265 d 20:23 ago) – Posting: # 11665
Views: 11,689

Dear John,

There are two queries from two different studies;

Situation 1: Situation somewhat similar to yours, where samples were collected up to 36 hrs post dose, but for some of the subjects AUCt could be calculated only up to 8 hrs, for some of the subjects it was up to 16 hrs and for some of the subjects up to 36 hrs.

Query 1: What approach we should implement while comparing such a variable AUCt? Is it a correct method to compare AUC8hrs to AUC36 hrs? Or Is there any other statistical method which we should adopt for such situation?

Situation 2: Samples were collected up to 36 hrs post dose and even achieved zero concentration quite before 36 hrs but still AUC% extrapolation was more than 20 % in many cases (e.g. profile is given in my earlier post)

Query 2: Since extrapolation is more than 20% how do we justify such situation?

I hope I am clear on this occasion.

Best Regards,

Ratnakar

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,676 registered users;
39 visitors (0 registered, 39 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 04:46 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Complex, statistically improbable things are by their nature
more difficult to explain than
simple, statistically probable things.    Richard Dawkins

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5