Conservative study planning [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by kumarnaidu – Mumbai, India, 2013-09-02 16:36 (4672 d 09:57 ago) – Posting: # 11408
Views: 8,939

Thanks Helmut,
The formulation is same.
One more thing I want to ask, by using mean ratio: 1.05, CV: 0.297 and power: 0.8 I am getting sample size of around 40. But as we know we failed to prove bioequivalent in our first study with sample size of 42 subjects then should we remain stick to 40 or some more research needed in this. Also earlier studies for the same formulation by others is showing that 30 to 40 is enough. Please guide me.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,570 registered users;
112 visitors (0 registered, 112 guests [including 24 identified bots]).
Forum time: 02:33 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Actually, science starts to become interesting
only where it ends.    Justus von Liebig

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5