Failed AUC 0-t [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Tina – India, 2013-08-29 15:11 (4687 d 08:12 ago) – Posting: # 11378
Views: 11,334

Dear Dan,
Thank you for your reply.

Please find below the requested information:

❝ a. What was the CVintra for Cmax?


25

❝ b. I guess it is a drug with a very long elimination half live, right? Did you use truncated AUC?


Median t1/2: 20.2±16.19h. The product is an IR product and PK sampling was done till 72h.

❝ c. If CVintra for Cmax << AUC and short t1/2, have you performed any outlier testing?


I dont have information on this. Will update when I recive them.

❝ d. What was the point estimator (T/R ratio) for AUC? Maybe the formulation difference is too big to just calculate with CVintra and the usual delta 5%.


116 (T/R ratio) for AUC

Kind regards,
Tina


Edit: Full quote removed. Please delete everything from the text of the original poster which is not necessary in understanding your answer; see also this post! [Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
367 visitors (0 registered, 367 guests [including 80 identified bots]).
Forum time: 23:23 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5