Failed AUC 0-t [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Tina – India, 2013-08-29 11:25 (4274 d 11:40 ago) – Posting: # 11376
Views: 10,273

Dear all,

I have received the results of a pilot study of an IR product.
N=20

90% CI for Cmax is within the BE criteria. However, the upper value of the 90% CI for the AUC 0 to t is 135!. The ISV for AUC 0 to t is 24%.

My questions are:
  1. If it were to be a product issue, would not both parameters be affected?
  2. What are the causes for having only failing AUC 0-t?
  3. Would increasing sample size (based on variability) to 28 be sufficient to counter the ISV of AUC 0-t?
Request guidance on the above study please.


Edit: Category changed. [Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,671 registered users;
96 visitors (0 registered, 96 guests [including 56 identified bots]).
Forum time: 23:05 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

If you shut your door to all errors
truth will be shut out.    Rabindranath Tagore

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5