Partial AUC? [NCA / SHAM]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2013-08-28 19:42 (4315 d 07:28 ago) – Posting: # 11372
Views: 10,450

Hi Dan,

❝ What do you think about this parameter?:

❝ partialAUC(0-Tmax)+(Tmax-T75%Cmax)


Not sure which time point(s) you mean for truncation. See the following example:
 0.5167 BQL
 1      1.144
 1.5    2.399
 2      3.226
 2.5    3.236
 3      2.943
 3.5    2.776
 4      3.393
 4.5    4.736
 5      3.934
 6      3.387
 9      1.643
12.0333 0.717
16.0167 0.231

tmax 4.5, Cmax 4.736, 75%Cmax 3.552. In Phoenix/WinNonlin-style that would mean linear inter­po­la­tion in the increasing sections () and loglinear in the decreasing sections ().* Therefore, the first intersection is at 4.059 and the second one at 5.682; t75% 1.623.

[image]

In PHX/WNL you get the area above 75%Cmax (0.774) and below (28.101) but I don’t think that this is what you had in mind.



Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,671 registered users;
48 visitors (0 registered, 48 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 03:11 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5