t75% [NCA / SHAM]

posted by mittyri  – Russia, 2013-08-28 11:51 (4679 d 14:03 ago) – Posting: # 11367
Views: 12,322

Hi Helmut, Dan & K@K!

I have similar questions reading this guide.

There's no translation issue in chapter 6.2. In Russian we have the same.

❝ ❝ Would it be possible to be bioequivalent with regard to AUC and Cmax but failing with regard to t75%?


❝ Yes, it is, The Lászlós (who else?) have shown that. Will excavate the reference.


According russian guide t75% is calculated (chapter 6.1).
So the question is: what can we do with this data?
As you can see in chapter 7 (Statistical evaluation of bioequivalence) this parameter isn't used.
Would you explain this issue?

Kind regards,
mittyri

Kind regards,
Mittyri

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
123 visitors (0 registered, 123 guests [including 23 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:54 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have finally come to the konklusion
that a good reliable set ov bowels
iz worth more to a man
than enny quantity of brains.    Josh Billings

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5