I thought I have seen everything [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2013-08-20 20:09 (4688 d 04:35 ago) – Posting: # 11323
Views: 8,719

Hi Helmut!

❝ ❝ […] Tada, some CRO managed to screw up some early timepoint collection by as much as 35mins!


❝ That’s a fucking lot! What happened? Normaly time deviations outside an “allowance window” stated in the protocol must be not only documented as such but also a comment in the CRF should be given justifiying the event. 35min?!


4 out of 30 subjects had this fiasco. Get this one --> Sampling time at 3.5 and 4.0 hour... They were late 35 mins for the 3.5 (meaning it crossed over into the 4 hr timepoint). They then draw a 4 hr timepint sample with a delay of 11 mins (It's obvious why, they didn't want to miss collecting a sample!!!)So now I have a 3.5hr sample with a +35min deviation and a 4 hr with a +11min deviation!!! what should I use for PAUC0-4??????

Reason for deviation? Couldn't get blood from sites of puncture! 35mins!???? how many time did they poke on the subjects arm(s)!!!!!
I wouldn't have gone ballistic if the reason was "Subject went into hiding somewhere in the dosing area"

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
124 visitors (0 registered, 124 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:44 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Science is simply common sense at its best that is,
rigidly accurate in observation, and
merciless to fallacy in logic.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5