Proc GLM with missings [Outliers]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2013-08-07 17:39 (3886 d 19:21 ago) – Posting: # 11237
Views: 10,062

Hi Helmut,

❝ BTW, I wonder where the origin of this rumour might be. :confused:


I thought the rumour was true for 2,2,2-BE evaluations where data from one period are missing.

d_labes: As for the bogus statement, I must say that the online SAS manual is not particularly informative. Since it does not give any behavioural particulars for GLM with bogus, I think it just behaves the same regardless of whether there are missing cells or not?!?

I would be interested to know how it figures out ls mean treatment difference. If there is a missing cell then I guess it is not the difference of treatment ls means. And what abut the df's for the treatment differences in such cases.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,957 posts in 4,819 threads, 1,636 registered users;
132 visitors (0 registered, 132 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 12:01 CET (Europe/Vienna)

With four parameters I can fit an elephant,
and with five I can make him wiggle his trunk.    John von Neumann

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5