Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Proc GLM with missings [Outliers]

posted by Helmut  – Vienna, Austria, 2013-08-07 17:21 (3913 d 03:22 ago) – Posting: # 11236
Views: 10,241

Dear Detlew!

❝ ❝ ... Note that PROC GLM will always drop the entire subject even if you kept the other periods in the data set.

❝

❝ This is an widely spread rumour, also here in the forum. But nevertheless isn't true .

❝

❝ What SAS does with the sequence effect test (random statement used) in such cases is left for discussion. Never understood it really.

THX for enlightening an SAS-illiterate. Now I remember that Jean-Michel showed me that a while ago. As an SAS-initiate he clicked around so fast that I couldn’t follow. He posted it also here. Will keep my mouth shut in the future.
BTW, I wonder where the origin of this rumour might be.

—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! 
Helmut Schütz


The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

• "Removal" of an outlier: subject vs period lechia 2013-08-06 23:23 
  • "Removal" of an outlier: subject vs period ElMaestro 2013-08-07 11:09
  • Canada: subject, not period Helmut 2013-08-07 13:48
    • Proc GLM with missings d_labes 2013-08-07 14:46
      • Proc GLM with missings jag009 2013-08-07 15:03
      • Proc GLM with missingsHelmut 2013-08-07 15:21
        • Proc GLM with missings ElMaestro 2013-08-07 15:39
          • Proc GLM with missings ElMaestro 2013-08-07 16:22
          • Proc GLM random d_labes 2013-08-07 16:46
        • Proc GLM with missings for 2x2 crossover d_labes 2013-08-07 16:34
    • Canada: subject, not period lechia 2013-08-07 15:46
      • Canada: subject, not period Helmut 2013-08-07 15:57
    • Canada: subject, not period lechia 2013-08-12 15:48