Re-dosing [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2013-08-02 16:44 (4714 d 10:42 ago) – Posting: # 11168
Views: 30,672

Hi John,

❝ ❝ Do you have a reference? If I recall it correctly the sample size should be six or 20% of subjects – whichever is larger. 26 small, IMHO. ;-)


❝ 26 < 124. You know what I mean by small (relative wise)...


You noted the irony smiley? Of course if one is used to run studies in 100+ subjects 26 are peanuts.

❝ I need to dig up that particular report of mine (not mine, someone ran it before my time).


Yes, please. AFAIK, the redosing sample size was never an official recommendation by the FDA. I have seen it in a few documents under FOI. Maybe I have them somewhere, but since they are all scanned PDFs no way of searching.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
309 visitors (0 registered, 309 guests [including 35 identified bots]).
Forum time: 03:27 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It requires a very unusual mind
to undertake the analysis of the obvious.    Alfred North Whitehead

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5