Three-way crossover (WinNonlin) [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2007-09-21 15:04 (6830 d 13:29 ago) – Posting: # 1109
Views: 48,055

Dear Nirali,

❝ Which hypothesis Winnonlin will use while running BE for 2 test (T1 & T2) vs a reference (R)?

❝ Would it be "MEAN(T1)=MEAN(T2)=MEAN(R)"?

❝ In threeway crossover study, does we try to compare Equivalence of all three product together?


Comparisons are based on paired differences; IMHO a simultaneous test of T1=T2=R is not possible.
WinNonlin always uses one reference in a run, i.e., T1=R (one test), and T2=R (the second test).
If you are interested in T1=T2 you have to start a second run (defining T2 as the reference), and will obtain two tests (T1=T2 and R=T2) within.

BTW, why are you interested in T1=T2?

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,571 registered users;
470 visitors (0 registered, 470 guests [including 31 identified bots]).
Forum time: 04:34 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I’m all in favor of the democratic principle
that one idiot is as good as one genius, but I draw the line
when someone takes the next step and concludes
that two idiots are better than one genius.    Leo Szilard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5