3-trt study? [Software]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2013-07-05 00:37 (4370 d 06:12 ago) – Posting: # 10941
Views: 12,076

Hi Helmut,

thanks for the comments.
In perspective, could this methodology then be extended to a 3-treatment parallel study (e.g. US Ref, EU Ref, Test)? I am thinking we'd just need another sigma squared on the diagonal and then be good to go? If that's the case then the WNL approach –however counterintuitive and retarded it might seem– could provide a solution to a problem which cannot be resolved by the standard t-test approach?
Oh and by the way, I think this would imply that the denominator DFs would have to be calculated from treatment A, B as well as C, when a 90% CI for A/B is constructed - that's perhaps also worthy of a heated debate further down the road...?

:pirate:

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,672 registered users;
36 visitors (0 registered, 36 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:49 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5