NIST; cross-validation [Software]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2013-07-04 02:45 (4325 d 16:21 ago) – Posting: # 10932
Views: 41,877

Dear Yung-jin,

❝ ❝ Note that NIST’s datasets do not necessarily represent the “truth”, only the “best-available” solutions. […]


❝ I see. But it has been good enough for comparing nonlinear regression software.


Sure. It’s nice to have results obtained in 128-bit precision. Important for ‘flat’ SSQ-surfaces where rounding may be an issue.

❝ ❝ Why? [:blahblah:]


❝ […] The textbook or published papers may have final results in Tables for their dataset, but do not have whole detailed output results.


Agree. The most detailed one is #1 from this post.

❝ ❝ BTW: WinNonlin Pro 4.01, but which versions of bear and SAS?

❝ bear was v2.4.0 (p.92) and SAS should be v9.1.3 I guessed when I was at KMU (university license).


THX!

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,669 registered users;
186 visitors (0 registered, 186 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:06 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

[Those] who have an excessive faith in their theories or in their
ideas are not only poorly disposed to make discoveries, but they
also make very poor observations.    Claude Bernard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5