NIST; cross-validation [Software]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2013-07-04 02:45 (4372 d 17:49 ago) – Posting: # 10932
Views: 42,376

Dear Yung-jin,

❝ ❝ Note that NIST’s datasets do not necessarily represent the “truth”, only the “best-available” solutions. […]


❝ I see. But it has been good enough for comparing nonlinear regression software.


Sure. It’s nice to have results obtained in 128-bit precision. Important for ‘flat’ SSQ-surfaces where rounding may be an issue.

❝ ❝ Why? [:blahblah:]


❝ […] The textbook or published papers may have final results in Tables for their dataset, but do not have whole detailed output results.


Agree. The most detailed one is #1 from this post.

❝ ❝ BTW: WinNonlin Pro 4.01, but which versions of bear and SAS?

❝ bear was v2.4.0 (p.92) and SAS should be v9.1.3 I guessed when I was at KMU (university license).


THX!

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,673 registered users;
45 visitors (0 registered, 45 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:34 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Reach for the stars,
even if you have to stand on a cactus.    Susan Longacre

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5