Internal Standard Variation [Bioanalytics]

posted by Charl – 2007-09-09 14:25 (6856 d 13:31 ago) – Posting: # 1064
Views: 17,399

Dear Harish, Ohlbe, & HS..

We should all go back to the concept of WHY do we need the IS.....!

as far as I know it is used to minimize the calculation errors raised by doing the Absolute peak (height or Area)...!!!

so... variability of IS should be at the minimum, it should be studied throughly while developening your method.
(e.g... as Ohlbe mentioned about LLOQ, the case will be due to only the area of the analyte (drug) that would vary to the 1/4, so having a minimal IS variability in this case, we will know that some thing went wrong).

from my personal experience....:-P I always think fresh, from scratch, for studying the variability of IS while developing, thus for each HPLC detector there is different approach, e.g, the electrochemical detector would be more sensitive than the UV, the LC MS/MS would take a different approach taking into account the ion enhancing and suppresing, matrix effect, etc.....

So finally I recommend that the IS variability is crucial, so we should do the simplest procedure of extraction, cause there were the most error would occur without noticing

regards....
Charl

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,571 registered users;
164 visitors (0 registered, 164 guests [including 17 identified bots]).
Forum time: 03:57 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

“Data! Data! Data!” he cried impatiently.
“I can’t make bricks without clay!”    Arthur Conan Doyle

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5