Spaghetti & other pasta [NCA / SHAM]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2013-05-24 03:24 (4784 d 19:59 ago) – Posting: # 10635
Views: 24,341

Dear Yung-jin!

❝ Now I think that I have fully understood the differences between the linear and the lin-up/log-down method for AUC calculations.


Hhm.

❝ Actually, lin-up/log-down method is still a kind of data smoothing approach.


No, it isn’t.

❝ The key point is that involved calculation step still uses the raw data to calculate the interpolated data.


There is no interpolation done at all. Have a look at my example in the previous post. I gave the interpolation/imputation formulas only as a hint what might happen if we need an intermediate data point. If we want to calculate the area in the interval [t2, t2] no interpolation, smoothing, whatsoever is done. Both methods are straightforward:

linear: AUCt1→t2=0.5(t2–t1)(C2+C1)
linlog: AUCt1→t2=(t2–t1)(C2–C1)/log(C2/C1)


❝ As we can see, the errors between linear and lin-up/log-down become significantly apparent, especially when sampling time between two data points is getting greater.


Right.

❝ Therefore, when there is missing data occurring, the lin-up/log-down method shows more accurate than the linear.


Xactly. See also Nathan’s PK/PD Blog.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
370 visitors (0 registered, 370 guests [including 79 identified bots]).
Forum time: 23:24 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5