Sorry [NCA / SHAM]

posted by gracehung – Taiwan, 2013-05-23 03:06 (4782 d 21:42 ago) – Posting: # 10624
Views: 24,445

Dear all:

Thanks for your reply!
The dilemma is we have the concentration data but don't have the actual sampling time. If we treat it as missing data, don't use it in bioequivalence evaluation, would assessor think we are hiding data? Should we include the data in PK analysis and use schedule time to be the "best guess"? One literature suggest to use log linear interpolation (at elimination phase) to minimize the bias (also as your reply). But someone said the assessor will think you are manipulating data. :confused: which one would be the best choice?

Grace

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
299 visitors (0 registered, 299 guests [including 24 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:49 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Ignorance more frequently begets confidence
than does knowledge.    Charles Darwin

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5