handling of missing data [NCA / SHAM]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2013-05-20 23:45 (4413 d 06:10 ago) – Posting: # 10609
Views: 20,665

Dear Gracehung,

❝ As in BE study, One sample’s actual sampling time was miss recorded. However as according to protocol, this sample was analyzed by our analytical laboratory.


I understand you question differently from Helmut. My understanding is that the sample was collected, but the phlebotomist failed to record the actual blood sampling time. In such a case I would just file a protocol deviation and re-train the staff, full stop. Even if there were a sampling time deviation, the influence on the AUC 90 % CI is so limited that it would only change the outcome of the trial in a very borderline situation.

Regards
Ohlbe

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,676 registered users;
40 visitors (0 registered, 40 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:55 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Complex, statistically improbable things are by their nature
more difficult to explain than
simple, statistically probable things.    Richard Dawkins

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5