Clopidogrel [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2013-04-10 12:34 (4434 d 07:49 ago) – Posting: # 10393
Views: 15,217

Dear Outlaw,

❝ [...] I'm not sure I understand what you mean by the EMA getting trapped. Do you mean that there are ways around justifying clopidogrel, or other drugs known for back-conversion, that EMA hadn't considered


Oh no... If the drug is know for back-conversion, I don't really see a way out.

❝ (the paper you quoted where the authors found a way of controlling back-conversion)?


Which means there is a need to study back-conversion anyway...

❝ If that's not the case, mind expanding on this


What I mean to say is that it may not be sufficient to test known metabolites for back-conversion, or to just say that the drug has no known metabolite which could be back-converted. What EMA recommended for clopidogrel was to demonstrate the lack of back-conversion of clopidogrel carboxyacid, the main metabolite, to clopidogrel. The simplest way to do it would be to spike blank plasma with clopidogrel carboxyacid, process it, and check that no clopidogrel is generated. It made sense: one could imagine that clopidogrel carboxyacid could be re-esterified with methanol, and that this could explain the back-conversion issues with clopidogrel which some people were talking about.

Problem: the metabolite which is back-converted is not the carboxyacid, but the acylglucuronide* (not described in the literature when EMA published their recommendation, as far as I know), by a transesterification mechanism. Silvestro et al. clearly demonstrate in their paper that what was recommended by EMA just doesn't work. Only ISR allowed them to first identify the issue, then develop a method with no back-conversion issue.



Regards
Ohlbe

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,679 registered users;
40 visitors (0 registered, 40 guests [including 22 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:23 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Nerds don’t just happen to dress informally.
They do it too consistently.
Consciously or not, they dress informally
as a prophylactic measure against stupidity.    Paul Graham

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5