Proc Mixed: parallel groups with different variabilities [Design Issues]
Hi Detlew,
I see what you mean
Yes there should be a intersubject CV for T and R separately since we have two pools of subjects given either T or R.
Thanks
John
❝ ❝ Personally I don't see what additional variability(ies) one can extract from a parallel study other than inter-subject CV ...
❝
❝ If this should be read total CV, correct.
❝ But the two groups of subjects (under Test or Reference treatment) would allow the separate estimation of CV(tot.)T and CV(tot.)R (or s2T, s2R in the log domain). And this should be reflected in the overall model.
I see what you mean

Thanks
John
Complete thread:
- drugs of long half life Ken Peh 2013-03-31 06:43 [Design Issues]
- drugs of long half life jag009 2013-04-02 15:17
- drugs of long half life Helmut 2013-04-02 15:34
- drugs of long half life jag009 2013-04-02 16:01
- drugs of long half life Helmut 2013-04-02 16:40
- parallel FDA d_labes 2013-04-04 08:33
- parallel FDA jag009 2013-04-05 18:01
- parallel FDA jag009 2013-04-05 21:10
- random repeated parallel FDA d_labes 2013-04-08 08:29
- Proc Mixed: random repeated parallel FDA jag009 2013-04-08 15:36
- Proc Mixed: parallel groups with different variabilities d_labes 2013-04-08 16:41
- Proc Mixed: parallel groups with different variabilitiesjag009 2013-04-08 20:22
- Proc Mixed: parallel groups with different variabilities d_labes 2013-04-08 16:41
- Proc Mixed: random repeated parallel FDA jag009 2013-04-08 15:36
- random repeated parallel FDA d_labes 2013-04-08 08:29
- parallel FDA d_labes 2013-04-04 08:33
- drugs of long half life Helmut 2013-04-02 16:40
- drugs of long half life jag009 2013-04-02 16:01
- drugs of long half life Ken Peh 2013-04-04 15:03
- drugs of long half life jag009 2013-04-05 17:45
- drugs of long half life Helmut 2013-04-02 15:34
- drugs of long half life jag009 2013-04-02 15:17