target α in sim’s? [RSABE / ABEL]
Hi Helmut!
IMHO: yes as this is a constant and should not dependent on the number of simulation runs. however, differences should be rather small by using 1E6 runs.
best regards
martin
Ps.: ... and yes its the same guy who is famous for publicly calling some approaches “bullshit”
IMHO: yes as this is a constant and should not dependent on the number of simulation runs. however, differences should be rather small by using 1E6 runs.
best regards
martin
Ps.: ... and yes its the same guy who is famous for publicly calling some approaches “bullshit”
Complete thread:
- ‘alpha’ of scaled ABE? d_labes 2013-03-15 15:56 [RSABE / ABEL]
- ‘alpha’ of scaled ABE? Helmut 2013-03-15 17:27
- ’alpha’ of scaled ABE: design d_labes 2013-03-16 20:10
- N=24, 48 d_labes 2013-03-18 08:11
- adaptive design without adjustment martin 2013-03-25 20:47
- α adjustment? Helmut 2013-03-26 15:21
- iteratively adjusted alpha martin 2013-03-26 16:19
- throw away our sample size tables? Helmut 2013-03-26 18:02
- if real martin 2013-03-26 19:44
- regulators don’t care? Helmut 2013-03-26 21:18
- adjusting α Helmut 2013-08-11 16:19
- if real martin 2013-03-26 19:44
- target α in sim’s? Helmut 2013-03-27 15:38
- target α in sim’s?martin 2013-03-27 16:36
- If it is real: results Helmut 2013-03-28 23:20
- having alpha martin 2013-03-28 15:08
- fixed swr Helmut 2013-03-28 23:34
- fixed swr martin 2013-03-29 15:07
- Yes but no but yes but no but… Helmut 2013-03-29 16:10
- fixed swr martin 2013-03-29 15:07
- fixed swr Helmut 2013-03-28 23:34
- target α in sim’s?martin 2013-03-27 16:36
- throw away our sample size tables? Helmut 2013-03-26 18:02
- iteratively adjusted alpha martin 2013-03-26 16:19
- α adjustment? Helmut 2013-03-26 15:21
- adaptive design without adjustment martin 2013-03-25 20:47
- N=24, 48 d_labes 2013-03-18 08:11
- ’alpha’ of scaled ABE: design d_labes 2013-03-16 20:10
- ‘alpha’ of scaled ABE? Helmut 2013-03-15 17:27