Two groups (e.g. logistics) [Design Issues]

posted by arl_stat – India, 2013-03-26 10:42 (4472 d 03:40 ago) – Posting: # 10284
Views: 9,076

Dear HS,

❝ since I recently had to deal with deficiency letters from the Gulf States (Saudia Arabia, Emirates), I would suggest the following procedure:

   Fixed:  Sequence + Treatment + Period + Group + Treatment × Group
   Random: Subject(Sequence)

Tests for Group and Treatment × Group.


❝ If the ‘Treatment × Group Interaction’ term is statistically not significant (p>0.05), the simple model (i.e., naïve pooling of data without both Group-terms) can be applied.


In additional to above model, Is it necessary to add factor Period(group). If yes then what it would imply. This is For a 2 way crossover study where subject has been divided into two equal groups with equal washout period.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,672 registered users;
35 visitors (0 registered, 35 guests [including 24 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:23 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Reach for the stars,
even if you have to stand on a cactus.    Susan Longacre

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5