’alpha’ of scaled ABE: design [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2013-03-16 20:10 (2980 d 00:14 ago) – Posting: # 10208
Views: 18,418

Dear Helmut!

» <nitpicking>

I would prefer a GMR of 0.80 since PowerTOST employs simulations – remember the “rounding thread”? ;-)

</nitpicking>

No rounding at all employed. Even 0.760... not.

» Which designs / sample sizes have you used? I’m struggling reproducing your numbers.

No explicit design written down in the code. That means default -> "2x3x3". n=48 if I remember correctly.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,460 posts in 4,486 threads, 1,511 registered users;
online 10 (0 registered, 10 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: Thursday 21:25 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Nothing in the world is more dangerous
than sincere ignorance
and conscientious stupidity.    Martin Luther King, Jr.

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5