ratio = difference of logs! [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2013-03-11 01:17 (3393 d 11:10 ago) – Posting: # 10181
Views: 21,117

Dear Chirag,

» […] does this apply to the untransformed or Ln transformed data
»
» The ratios were fine with the Ln transformed data.

Raw data! You need the ln-transformed data only in the BE-statistics. You would have to calculate the difference of logs and backtransform to get % covered. Example:

AUCt 375, AUC 500, covered: 100×375/500=75%.
lnAUCt 5.9269, lnAUC 6.2146, covered: 100×ℯ5.9269–6.2146=75%.

A ratio of logs (95.37%) is nonsense.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖 [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,165 posts in 4,645 threads, 1,572 registered users;
online 10 (0 registered, 10 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: Saturday 13:27 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Absolute certainty is a privilege of uneducated minds  and fanatics.
It is, for scientific folk, an unattainable ideal.    Cassius J. Keyser

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5