ratio = difference of logs! [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2013-03-11 02:17 (3999 d 00:57 ago) – Posting: # 10181
Views: 23,473

Dear Chirag,

❝ […] does this apply to the untransformed or Ln transformed data


❝ The ratios were fine with the Ln transformed data.


Raw data! You need the ln-transformed data only in the BE-statistics. You would have to calculate the difference of logs and backtransform to get % covered. Example:

AUCt 375, AUC 500, covered: 100×375/500=75%.
lnAUCt 5.9269, lnAUC 6.2146, covered: 100×ℯ5.9269–6.2146=75%.

A ratio of logs (95.37%) is nonsense.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,899 posts in 4,806 threads, 1,651 registered users;
32 visitors (0 registered, 32 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 03:14 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Statistics is, or should be, about scientific investigation
and how to do it better, but many statisticians believe
it is a branch of mathematics.    George E.P. Box

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5